- Joined
- Aug 29, 2006
- Messages
- 310
- Reaction score
- 0
I never said the JU program director is leaving JU. He left another school for JU. I don't like Lazzara, I'm not a fan of his plan, but I do like the residents. I separate Lazzara, and the plan from the people involved in the plan (as long as those people didn't create the plan).
I know a handful of OEC residents, too. I like them on a personal level. However, I can't agree w/ their decision. They didn't draw up the plan, but they're actively carrying it out. They're Lazzara's instruments.
I understand your claim that the program director, the students, and everyone is separate from corporate OEC. I just don't believe it is completely separate. OEC's corporate side cannot function w/o the education arm. That's the way they drew it up. Nobody (at least not a bunch per year x 3 schools) would work according to OEC's terms if they weren't forced to. And nobody would allow themselves to be forced to work that way if they had a viable alternative. OCA (Lazzara's ortho company immediately prior to OEC) went belly up because they couldn't get orthodontists to work for them. So, they knew they had to get in the business of education. Sign kids up for ortho school, make them work for you after, and make lots of $.
OEC and their hand-picked students are coupled through the admissions process. That's why most of us feel the school itself and its residents are also connected to OEC and share in its stigma and tarnished reputation. As much as they would like, the education arm cannot be entirely independent.
This is why you can't fully separate the people involved in the plan, in my opinion. They are in the plan. The plan doesn't work w/o them.