Strongly disagree. It's simple supply and demand.
Where do you work?
If it's a PPS exempt or similar academic center in a high cost of living and generally considered favorable location (a city like NY, PH, Boston, DC, Miami, LA, Seattle. SF, Chicago), you have no idea what the market is like where I am.
There is so much cultural capital in a large, urban, academic place, that you will always be able to staff it. You will always have less leverage for negotiating salary and almost uniformly will be paid less than where I am. You will also be more susceptible to administrative overreach.
I doubt that staffing medical oncology is difficult where you are, and between hematology and oncology there may be 50 to over a hundred docs. This is not a place with 4-6 generalists.
This is where I am. A 200 bed hospital system with a massively growing and aging demographic more than 2 hours away from a major metro.
There are whole regions of rural America with massive net negative oncology staffing at the physician level. (As in roughly 400k people and a net -10 in terms of oncologists available).
I am speaking for medonc only, as I've said before, we can more than make do with who is out there in terms of radiation oncology.
Call it healthy if you want. Your so called healthy market will result in further consolidation and asking the population to travel 90 min to 2 hours for cancer care will just harm the radonc market even more. I would be treated far worse (if I could even land a job) at a large regional center that had taken over care in my area than I am by the local hospital.
It's a failed market. There is a gross physician shortage of some types of docs (not radonc) in this country. When hospitals and practices loose any ability to provide care or select hires, it is not good.
Endless metrics that are impossible to meet with your bonus in the balance, staff are equal to the MD in all disputes and asking them to do anything results in one of these "staff complaints", and anything on your record that isn't a perfect score gets held against you forever? Yes, I know what that "commitment to quality" is. Feels great to be in the patient room asking patients to make sure they give me a perfect score on that survey they're going to get just like the guy who sold me my Kia.
I'm sorry that this is your experience, and I have witnessed lesser versions of this behavior by admin myself. This is not the culture where I am at present. Admin that behave this way have lost sight of who does the work. However, you may not be privy to the behavior of low quality docs at your place (everybody who is at a center like yours has some degree of buy in). I'm talking about docs who lose 20% of their new patient referrals after their first patient encounter because they suck and then say, "what are you going to do about it, fire me?" This behavior exists. If there is no possibility of replacing the doc, it engenders bad care.
Now I believe that it is large institutions like yours that are largely to blame. (Not you personally at all). They often expand into the region and their size and market dominance further erodes physician leverage (it's not just supply and demand that dictate physician leverage, but diversity of opportunity). They often sell a message that working in the community is less and do not in general have a mission "to train community doctors", although this is where the need is greatest.
Any medical oncologist from your institution or similar would be welcomed with open arms in a community like mine, would be paid more, would be understood to be a valuable asset and the key stakeholder in the practice and would constantly have their opinion solicited regarding improving care. However, they never come this way, or if they do, they want an admin job or a very defined part time job before retirement.