- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
- Messages
- 1,023
- Reaction score
- 821
(Please don’t quote.)
There have been many posts of Kaiser vs. T5/10/20 and for the most part typically endorse a Kaiser selection unless choosing high paying specialty and cost difference <$200k and especially if No aid.
However, the decision becomes both easier and harder when one factors in the fact that the T5/10/20 would be full cost via loans (lean Kaiser) BUT Kaiser has no home competitive residency for surgical/ sub specialty/ortho/pediatric-surgical making it significantly more difficult to even get into a specialty like good Ortho Residency (lean T5/10/20).
Even if PD general ranking for Kaiser is very favorable, I would think competitive specialties where there are no home residencies would not be ranked as favorably, as well as significantly reduced clinical, research, and mentorship opportunities in that missing home program further reducing one’s competitiveness.
Who can help argue against this assessment? Which would you recommend in this scenario?
There have been many posts of Kaiser vs. T5/10/20 and for the most part typically endorse a Kaiser selection unless choosing high paying specialty and cost difference <$200k and especially if No aid.
However, the decision becomes both easier and harder when one factors in the fact that the T5/10/20 would be full cost via loans (lean Kaiser) BUT Kaiser has no home competitive residency for surgical/ sub specialty/ortho/pediatric-surgical making it significantly more difficult to even get into a specialty like good Ortho Residency (lean T5/10/20).
Even if PD general ranking for Kaiser is very favorable, I would think competitive specialties where there are no home residencies would not be ranked as favorably, as well as significantly reduced clinical, research, and mentorship opportunities in that missing home program further reducing one’s competitiveness.
Who can help argue against this assessment? Which would you recommend in this scenario?