interesting.
Is VIEWRAY for REAL?
Is VIEWRAY for REAL?
I hope he has a lot of stock in the company the way he’s acting.
For what it's worth, my personal interactions with Percy have great. I know the UCLA program that he was from had a pretty strong MR-LINAC bias and I think that can explain his enthusiasm.I hope he has a lot of stock in the company the way he’s acting.
Probably deserves at least a modifier or something, not sure proud protons ever deserved that code outside of specific icd codesMRI-Linac proponents are as fanatical as proton proponents. But protons get paid. realtime MRI guidance needs a CPT code
ROCR? Getting conspiratorial of course. Is a code pending? Are investors part of code advocacy?It's worth a long shot investment IMO. If they get a cpt code it's game on, right?
I am very curious though which docs/departments have invested in this now though. Nothing inherently wrong here, but financial disclosures will be interesting.
not sure any docs invested, but some like Percy and Drew where receiving large consulting fees. MRI linacs should have additional codes, but they really ought to be confined to large university centers.It's worth a long shot investment IMO. If they get a cpt code it's game on, right?
I am very curious though which docs/departments have invested in this now though. Nothing inherently wrong here, but financial disclosures will be interesting.
ROCR? Getting conspiratorial of course. Is a code pending? Are investors part of code advocacy?
not sure any docs invested, but some like Percy and Drew where receiving large consulting fees. MRI linacs should have additional codes, but they really ought to be confined to large university centers.
This is rumor status and I would maybe not even believe it. It sounds like there was work being done on a code but collaboration among stakeholders was an issue, so that died. This rumor predated the company going under by several months so Im skeptical its still relevant.
It's remarkable to me that the biology guided RT was able to get a code already. Given how the pay looks, I think this machine will now explode and I still don't even understand why it helps anyone! I want to learn though, Im not convinced it doesnt help.
Yes.
I hate to be cynical but there is probably some very "interesting" back story or strategy involved there. If everything is on the up-and-up then Viewray and Elekta need to purge that reflexion regulatory team ASAP. They greased the correct wheels.
Yes.
I hate to be cynical but there is probably some very "interesting" back story or strategy involved there. If everything is on the up-and-up then Viewray and Elekta need to purge that reflexion regulatory team ASAP. They greased the correct wheels.
View attachment 381308
RefleXion Announces Initial Close of $105M Fundraising to Commercialize New Cancer Treatment - RefleXion
Funds will allow further commercial penetration and new application development HAYWARD, Calif., Nov. 15, 2023 – RefleXion Medical, a therapeutic oncology company, today announced the initial closing of a $105M equity raise, led by The Rise Fund, TPG’s multi-sector global impact investing...reflexion.com
MRI-Linac proponents are as fanatical as proton proponents. But protons get paid. realtime MRI guidance needs a CPT code
In my book all three of these technologies (protons, MRgRT, BgRT) are in the same category: they are physics ways to get more dose to the right location. At least with protons we've seen the technology misused, being applied to patients mainly for the sake of financial return. But we see this e.g. in fractionation schedules too.It's remarkable to me that the biology guided RT was able to get a code already.
Not sure there is a big investment if it's a private entity. When a company dissolves, all stakeholders want to preserve as much value as possible. If you're about the shut down the factories and write off the total thing as a total loss, but then someone steps in and says "I'll pay $5 million for that," then even if the original price was $50 million, it makes sense for them to take it. The shareholders will get a few pennies back on the dollar, better than nothing.Who is the fool that is investing in this??? I wish it the best of luck, but from a financial standpoint, I think it is unwise, especially now with all the press out noting it's financial instability...
HahahahahahaI’ve been on Reflexion sales pitch call. They want us to do “total metastatic ablation” (like SBRT to 20 lesions). Lately, data on SBRT in metastatic setting have not been good. Payors are not impressed still.
I’d pass
Have you heard anything about centers that shut down their systems? Are they bringing them back up now?
I wonder how many of the private investors are radiation oncologists.
It makes me a little uncomfortable how emotional some of the physicians are about this machine, but Im happy it's back in play. I wonder if the private investors are also going to fund the randomized pancreas trial that was planned! Would be awesome.
This would have been my assumption. Liking the machine aside, the economics would likely favor salvaging the investment for most centers.Some never stopped, stopped temporarily only, or limited use but continued for selected applications. This is particularly common in Europe.
Most centers in the USA I think want to get their machines back in use. I can think of one exception that has stated that they will not be coming back online.
Basically, nearly everyone who used one of these machines enjoyed using it and wants it back.
Most were up and running about a month or so after the bankruptcy. Some folks hired their own engineers or signed service contracts with third parties. Our center has been treating at normal capacity since the end of November.I wonder if some centers still keep the MRIdians working. Don't they break? Perhaps these centers hired some of the former Viewray service engineers, but what happens with the spare parts?