Navy USS Theodore Roosevelt COVID-19 crisis

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Wow.

From the Command Investigation: “For the TR SMO specifically, a detachment for cause due to substandard performance is recommended.“

Then, in his cover letter endorsement to the report, the CNO uses the terms “exceedingly poor judgment” when referring to the SMO email.

Ouch.

Out of curiosity, if one is detached for cause (non-UCMJ) is that a mandatory reporting to state licensing board?
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
DFCs are administrative procedures. Obviously I don’t know what every state has in their list of questions but no where I’ve been licensed would require reporting.
 
"Shortly after Friday’s news conference, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee announced that Congress is launching its own investigation into the coronavirus outbreak aboard the Theodore Roosevelt to find out what mistakes senior Navy leaders made."

taskandpurpose.com

The Navy has shamefully made the USS Theodore Roosevelt’s former captain a scapegoat

Capt. Brett Crozier will not be reinstated as the commanding officer of the USS Theodore Roosevelt. Adm. Philip Davidson, who approved the ship's port call to Vietnam, will not be disciplined.
taskandpurpose.com taskandpurpose.com
 
DrMetal said:
Just curious, any one know his (the SMO's) specialty?
Click to expand...


He's a USNA grad and former aviator himself. USUHS, AOA, Rads and IR.

Smart money says SMO was recommended for detachment for cause (with CNO sprinkling a little “extremely poor judgment” into the recipe) since SMO is a former line officer. And USNA grad. Kinda hard to play the “I’m just a doctor” excuse with that background.
 
Last edited:
Monty Python said:
He's a USNA grad and former aviator himself. USUHS, AOA, Rads and IR.

Smart money says SMO was recommended for detachment for cause (with CNO sprinkling a little “extremely poor judgment” into the recipe) since SMO is a former line officer. And USNA grad. Kinda hard to play the “I’m just a doctor” excuse with that background.
Click to expand...

What exactly did the SMO do? Sent an email off ship?
 
DrMetal said:
What exactly did the SMO do? Sent an email off ship?
Click to expand...

see post 201. emailed 160 folks outside the CoC.

From the investigation report:

316. The TR SMO sent the Medical Department letter via email to the Surgeon General copying CPF and C7F Surgeons and a few other senior leaders within Navy medicine.

317. Approximately three minutes later, the TR SMO sent the Medical Department letter via email to over 160 recipients, none of whom were in TR’s operational or administrative chain of command.
 
Last edited:
Monty Python said:
see post 201

forums.studentdoctor.net

Navy - USS Theodore Roosevelt COVID-19 crisis

https://www.secnav.navy.mil/foia/readingroom/HotTopics/TR%20INVESTIGATION/Consolidated%20Findings%20of%20Fact%20(Redacted%20for%20release%20).pdf D-43 SMO sent a letter to 160 folks outside the TR chain of command.
forums.studentdoctor.net forums.studentdoctor.net
Click to expand...

Yeah, lines 309-317. I dunno, I get what he was trying to do with the letter, but threatening your chain like that is very bold and makes for a dangerous precedent. I don't think the SMO should be punished, as this was an unprecedented event, but I don't condone using the threat of the media.
 
It sounded like outright mutiny in the TR medical department, considering almost all of the staff signed that letter and threatened to go to the media with it.
 
what is the current typical medical dept staffing on a CVN... you hear a lot in these forums about GMO flight surgeon tour, but how many actual medical officers are typically on the staff
 
Members don't see this ad :)
cv-6 said:
what is the current typical medical dept staffing on a CVN... you hear a lot in these forums about GMO flight surgeon tour, but how many actual medical officers are typically on the staff
Click to expand...

During my time on a Nimitz-class carrier, the ship’s company medical department had:

Officers:
1 senior medical officer. Ours just happened to be an internist. 75% admin and 25% clinical.
1 surgeon.
1 anesthesia provider, either anesthesiologist or CRNA.
1 junior GMO physician.
1 RN.
1 general duty PA.
1 physical therapist.
1 non-clergy mental health provider, either psychiatrist or doctoral-level psychologist.
Several pharmacists.
4 general dentists.
2 oral surgeons (also functioned as anesthesia backup).
1 periodontist.

When embarked, the airwing brought their own imbedded flight surgeons with them. One or two.

Enlisted: lab techs, xray techs, corpsmen (ie, “medics”), etc.
 
I seem to remember more than 1 GMO, lots of flight surgeons around when underway.
 
thanks for the info, that is quite interesting. what is the typical rank of the SMO, O-5? Also in general outside of the GMO tours, what are the service path options that have shipboard vs land side service, ie is this a typical rotation path that if you stay in long enough, ie USUHS commitment that you likely experience naturally or if interested there is high likelihood of getting a rotation like , etc
 
Send no message, get criticized by the investigation into the outbreak (there were going to be several as crew had been complaining to family about the situation) for not utilizing supposed resources available. Send a message up the medical department chain and get told to shut up and follow the operational chain's plan, failing or not. Then get criticized later anyway for not having been persuasive enough to the chain given the facts as-known. Send a message up and outside the chain, and get criticized by the senior PACCOM for "poor leadership." And then get threatened with "discipline."

Was there a workable option that didn't end in being thrown under the bus? No.

Admirals Baker, Davidson, Burke and Gilday all deserve a nice hot grilling by the Congress. No pity and no excuses from any of them.
 
orbitsurgMD said:
Was there a workable option that didn't end in being thrown under the bus? No.

Admirals Baker, Davidson, Burke and Gilday all deserve a nice hot grilling by the Congress. No pity and no excuses from any of them.
Click to expand...


A former ASECDEF chimes in.

www.militarytimes.com

Officials continue to throw Capt. Brett Crozier under the bus for outbreak on Navy carrier

Unlike Capt. Brett Crozier, other military and civilian officials have not been held accountable for the response to the coronavirus outbreak on the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, says the author of this commentary.
www.militarytimes.com www.militarytimes.com
 
orbitsurgMD said:
Send no message, get criticized by the investigation into the outbreak (there were going to be several as crew had been complaining to family about the situation) for not utilizing supposed resources available. Send a message up the medical department chain and get told to shut up and follow the operational chain's plan, failing or not. Then get criticized later anyway for not having been persuasive enough to the chain given the facts as-known. Send a message up and outside the chain, and get criticized by the senior PACCOM for "poor leadership." And then get threatened with "discipline."

Was there a workable option that didn't end in being thrown under the bus? No.

Admirals Baker, Davidson, Burke and Gilday all deserve a nice hot grilling by the Congress. No pity and no excuses from any of them.
Click to expand...
If you’re gonna lose either way, always pick the loss that protects your soldiers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
ProwlerturnGas said:
news.usni.org

Complete Command Probe into USS Theodore Roosevelt COVID-19 Outbreak - USNI News

The following is the complete June 19, 2020 command investigation and appendices into the chain of command response to the COVID-19 outbreak aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt. From the report This command investigation inquired into the communications, decisions, and actions that took place within...
news.usni.org news.usni.org
Click to expand...
There is a whitewash-like quality to this report. Remember, it is written by the very COC criticized for its having ordered the TR to Vietnam, so a bias is suspect. The claims that that COC was working to resolve berthing ashore in Guam does not appear to be held to the same quality of scrutiny as the decisions of the captain of the TR, nor is there any evidence shown how the COC made an effort to convince anyone, never mind order immediate berthing ashore to available facilities if in fact that was the better choice of action at the time. Why the pass for them? Oh yeah, the purpose is to fix responsibility at the lowest level of command and to exonerate those at the highest levels, including the civilian chain at Defense. How nice to see a varnish of CINCPAC and senior command endorsement on the cover.

Seriously, a decent lawyer would pick this document and its conclusion to pieces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

militaryPHYS
All Branch Topic (ABT) Real-Time COVID-19 Information
Replies
38
Views
2K
SLC
SLC
LTMCUSN
COVID-19 hospitalization “permanently disqualifying”, says USMEPCOM
Replies
3
Views
1K
GreenHousePub
GreenHousePub
D
All Branch Topic (ABT) COVID PCS
Replies
10
Views
1K
pgg
pgg
backrow
Navy GMO Death on USS Arlington
Replies
10
Views
3K
Cooperd0g
Cooperd0g
DrMetal
COVID Vaccine: why is it not required for all DOD personnel?
2 3
Replies
128
Views
6K
DrMetal
DrMetal
Top