Hi everybody,
I'm currently split between psych, derm, and peds, but realize that it's probably not a good idea to pursue three specialties at once.
I was hoping to get some insight on whether I should pursue peds, given my background info as well as my pros and cons list for and against peds.
The points I make below are based on limited amount of exposure and are generalizations based on this experience.
Thanks so much in advance!
Background info:
- I came into med school wanting psych, liked derm lectures (and rotation) so decided to consider derm, and loved peds rotation.
- I like the concept of IM (lots of thinking through problems) but didn't like the execution -- working up dozens of complex comorbidities from years ago which patients sometimes don't recover from, and are sometimes perpetuated by the patients' lack of willingness to change their lifestyles (eg. smoking, alcohol etc)
- I have great respect for family doctors and enjoy the variety of conditions treated by GPs. One thing I personally didn't enjoy is the amount of not-as-clinical work the profession can involve (signing forms/papers/health check-ups requested by employers/to some extent prescription renewal on stable illnesses)
Points for peds:
- Loved the staff and the residents! Everyone was so happy and helpful
- Children are usually healthy. They usually recover well from illnesses, and don't have too many comorbidities. In other words, I am using my cognitive problem solving skills, but aren't working up dozens of chronic diseases where outcomes may not change.
- The variety in presentation is quite nice. It also helps that GP's have deemed the patient warranted further workup for medical reasons and have referred the patients to pediatricians. So unlike other specialties, I would get the undifferentiated presentations that I liked about family medicine, but some of the not-as-medical or not-as-clinical visits have already been weeded out.
Points against peds:
- Honestly, I sometimes facepalmed (internally) more than once when well-intentioned, but hyperanxious parents bring in their kids for reasons which need reassurance/education rather than medical interventions (eg. short stature in short parents, coming in for the flu etc). Although I do think reassurance is part of any medical field, I did see a greater proportion of the "worried-well" in pediatrics compared to any other discipline I've been exposed to. I know anxiety/reassurance will be a huge part of psych (one of my alternative careers), but maybe subconsciouly, I am more understanding of their presentation because I know it is part of their pathology.
- Although children are growing on me now post-rotation, I've never historically been a "children-person". I have no problems interacting with them but haven't been one of those people whose eyes just widen and hearts just melt when they see children. When they're behaving well, I find them cute but find that I don't know what to do when they're misbehaving/crying. Of course, being a "children-person" isn't a dealbreaker for becoming a good pediatrician, but I think it certainly helps.
I'm currently split between psych, derm, and peds, but realize that it's probably not a good idea to pursue three specialties at once.
I was hoping to get some insight on whether I should pursue peds, given my background info as well as my pros and cons list for and against peds.
The points I make below are based on limited amount of exposure and are generalizations based on this experience.
Thanks so much in advance!
Background info:
- I came into med school wanting psych, liked derm lectures (and rotation) so decided to consider derm, and loved peds rotation.
- I like the concept of IM (lots of thinking through problems) but didn't like the execution -- working up dozens of complex comorbidities from years ago which patients sometimes don't recover from, and are sometimes perpetuated by the patients' lack of willingness to change their lifestyles (eg. smoking, alcohol etc)
- I have great respect for family doctors and enjoy the variety of conditions treated by GPs. One thing I personally didn't enjoy is the amount of not-as-clinical work the profession can involve (signing forms/papers/health check-ups requested by employers/to some extent prescription renewal on stable illnesses)
Points for peds:
- Loved the staff and the residents! Everyone was so happy and helpful
- Children are usually healthy. They usually recover well from illnesses, and don't have too many comorbidities. In other words, I am using my cognitive problem solving skills, but aren't working up dozens of chronic diseases where outcomes may not change.
- The variety in presentation is quite nice. It also helps that GP's have deemed the patient warranted further workup for medical reasons and have referred the patients to pediatricians. So unlike other specialties, I would get the undifferentiated presentations that I liked about family medicine, but some of the not-as-medical or not-as-clinical visits have already been weeded out.
Points against peds:
- Honestly, I sometimes facepalmed (internally) more than once when well-intentioned, but hyperanxious parents bring in their kids for reasons which need reassurance/education rather than medical interventions (eg. short stature in short parents, coming in for the flu etc). Although I do think reassurance is part of any medical field, I did see a greater proportion of the "worried-well" in pediatrics compared to any other discipline I've been exposed to. I know anxiety/reassurance will be a huge part of psych (one of my alternative careers), but maybe subconsciouly, I am more understanding of their presentation because I know it is part of their pathology.
- Although children are growing on me now post-rotation, I've never historically been a "children-person". I have no problems interacting with them but haven't been one of those people whose eyes just widen and hearts just melt when they see children. When they're behaving well, I find them cute but find that I don't know what to do when they're misbehaving/crying. Of course, being a "children-person" isn't a dealbreaker for becoming a good pediatrician, but I think it certainly helps.