Docmax__67
Student
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2021
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1
If a newly graduated med schl student has to choose in between rad onc and IM which one should they prefer and why??
We can be great solid tumor oncologists in the right setting. I do not catfish and send as much business (or more) to medical oncology as I receive. The biggest problem now is we are creating too many of us.A huge problem with our field is we separated from DR, for reasons that made sense at the time. We do not have other training to fall back on to change jobs, make up income or save oneself from ruin and breadlines. Most fields have this basic skill. With declining compensation and demand, this leaves us cornered unable to do DR, or do systemic therapy. It is basically retrain or leave medicine altogether…
a derm path can do regulae path. A pulm CCM can do HTN management. We cant do shiza.
I agree that we have the training and knowledge to be great onologists but we do not currently or ever will have the ability to be primary oncologists unless the path is created and im not aware of serious talks of doing this… i believe this might be our only saving grace. I hated DR, and i dont want to read films. I want to be an oncologist.We can be great solid tumor oncologists in the right setting. I do not catfish and send as business (or more) much to medical oncology as I receive. The biggest problem now is we are creating too many of us.
Technically a heme onc can't be either. You seriously letting them treat your glottics, prostate and skin cancer cases, sista?I agree that we have the training and knowledge to be great onologists but we do not currently or ever will have the ability to be primary oncologists unless the path is created and im not aware of serious talks of doing this…
Plenty of demand for PCPs. Easy to see a world in which MD PCPs pick and choose their patients while the NPs see the poorly insured. We get a lot of business from places who are glad to see us and not a PA/NP.Neither unless subspecializing after IM
Laws allowing NPs and PAs to act as PCPs is the future
I’m in a system where the med oncs receive all the cancer patients and serve as the referral source for the community. Let’s just say it’s been damn near impossible for me to change the pattern. I’ve noticed that it takes new docs coming into the system to even have a chance to change the game.Technically a heme onc can't be either. You seriously letting them treat your glottics, prostate and skin cancer cases, sista?
Key point. That's exactly how the practice i inherited was when i moved to town with 8 pts under treatmentI’m in a system where the med oncs receive all the cancer patients and serve as the referral source for the community. Let’s just say it’s been damn near impossible for me to change the pattern. I’ve noticed that it takes new docs coming into the system to have chance to change the game.
What do you recommend that @RadOncDoc21 does to re-direct the flow through her/him?Key point. That's exactly how the practice i inherited was when i moved to town with 8 pts under treatment
Get to know him/her, be visible at tumor boards, learn the art of cross/reverse referrals back to your referrings, it's ok to see that new elective dx you get inpatient rather than turf and take the opportunity to build relationships in the hospital when you're starting out (honestly what's a med onc going to do if someone gets admitted for hemoptysis, bone pain etc). Arguably this is easier in a PP/independent setting but i think these principles can be done anywhere to some degreeWhat do you recommend that @RadOncDoc21 does to re-direct the flow through her/him?
This is like “As a newly sexually actively person, if I had to choose between women or men which one should I prefer and why.”If a newly graduated med schl student has to choose in between rad onc and IM which one should they prefer and why??
I think I said that more succinctly.This is like “As a newly sexually actively person, if I had to choose between women or men which one should I prefer and why.”
Search your heart. I bet you know the answer already.
I'm pretty much interested in cardiology and oncology..but I wanna settle a bit early. So I thought it would be good if i get a suggestion from u ppl that's it.!This is like “As a newly sexually actively person, if I had to choose between women or men which one should I prefer and why.”
Search your heart. I bet you know the answer already.
What do you mean..like there won't be any future for radonc??Just because you choose radonc doesn’t mean you will be practicing it. We are one black swan event (ctc dna ruling out adjuvant xrt across numerous disease sites w/in 10 years) from actual bread lines.
There will be a future for 50-70% of us probably. Like i said, what do you think happens when there is true demand for 120/year and academic centers around the country are collectively graduating 200/year?What do you mean..like there won't be any future for radonc??
Radonc will be part of cancer for foreseeable future, but that does t mean today’s medstudents will be part of it.What do you mean..like there won't be any future for radonc??
will AI take over our roles ??Radonc will be part of cancer for foreseeable future, but that does t mean today’s medstudents will be part of it.
I would be surprised if AI would completely take over our jobs in our lifetime. Beyond the technology, you can't underestimate how valuable the human connection is to most patients - you can be a terrible doctor, on the medical side, but if patients like and trust you, you'll likely have a long career.will AI take over our roles ??
No, as of now ai is largely sh—t is very unimpressive. Think watson.will AI take over our roles ??
Forgetting the job market woes, if you’re talking non speciality IM, these are incredibly different fields. “Do you want a hamburger or a chair?”If a newly graduated med schl student has to choose in between rad onc and IM which one should they prefer and why??