Hi Everyone,
So I recently took the CSE and I genuinely came out expecting to have passed, but I failed (100F).
My content scores were: Comm. Skills: 77, Aff. Skills: 99, Psychomotor sklz: 41, Clinical observation; 44.
For individual stations: 1:276.67 / 348.55, 2:235.16 / 300.17, 3: 172.25 / 191.57, 4: 55.44 / 159.71.
I have no idea why I failed station 4 so bad, when I was performing it, I was mostly worried about station 3, not 4. They did have trouble seeing the video through my camera at first, even though I had clear visuals, but they stated that they did have visuals at the 3rd attempt. I had no idea how to fix for them to have a view, so I made sure to state all findings out loud just incase.
The reason I'm posting here is because, would you suggest my paying the $450 for a video review? I know I am competent with BIO and 90 ( I failed heavily on both sections here, even though I had good visuals).
I was just so upset. Even if they do review, does anyone know what their criteria is for re reviewing?
Anyone have any experience with this? I feel like the camera issues is something they need to make sure of, not us.
So I recently took the CSE and I genuinely came out expecting to have passed, but I failed (100F).
My content scores were: Comm. Skills: 77, Aff. Skills: 99, Psychomotor sklz: 41, Clinical observation; 44.
For individual stations: 1:276.67 / 348.55, 2:235.16 / 300.17, 3: 172.25 / 191.57, 4: 55.44 / 159.71.
I have no idea why I failed station 4 so bad, when I was performing it, I was mostly worried about station 3, not 4. They did have trouble seeing the video through my camera at first, even though I had clear visuals, but they stated that they did have visuals at the 3rd attempt. I had no idea how to fix for them to have a view, so I made sure to state all findings out loud just incase.
The reason I'm posting here is because, would you suggest my paying the $450 for a video review? I know I am competent with BIO and 90 ( I failed heavily on both sections here, even though I had good visuals).
I was just so upset. Even if they do review, does anyone know what their criteria is for re reviewing?
Anyone have any experience with this? I feel like the camera issues is something they need to make sure of, not us.