So I'm on the old side of nontraditional (39), but my general stats are okay: 3.9gpa, LOR from the dean, assistant dean, and head of regional drug development center, plenty of "life experiences" and volunteering and 140 hrs shadowing in my favor, but the problem is that I've been thinking about research for a while and the more I think about it the more I want to get back into it, but because of a chance occurrence there's no real way I can get some research out to journals by the time I apply.
I'm not lacking for focus: I'm specifically interested in autism and in looking at it from two angles that often don't occur to researchers––I have some insight because I'm on the autism spectrum. I've reduced some broad ideas into over a dozen possible experiments ranging from meta-analyses to large lab experiments involving techniques I'd need to be taught.
I was set to begin in a lab last month but the lab director, who's one of my mentors and who I would be working with, got terrible news: his wife was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He's obviously distracted now and I can't fault him for it at all but I've tried over a dozen other researchers over the past two years and they either don't have time or their research doesn't overlap enough with my interests. I've explained to everyone that any lab experience is good experience, but there's a lot of competition for lab assistant slots at my school and most are taken by grad students.
I wanted to begin autism research now and pursue it through med school, though I am probably too old (and nontraditional in other ways) for an MD, much less an MD/PhD; do I throw together some informatics things on my own and explain my interests and why I haven't pursued them yet, or do I need evidence on record of X months/years of experience in order to 1) get into med school, and 2) pursue any research while at med school?
Right now I feel like I have zero chance of getting in anywhere without lab research experience, so I'm contemplating not even applying if I'm automatically going to be rejected because I couldn't find research. Again, though, with a social sciences and humanities/qualitative background I could do something quick and dirty on my own or with faculty at the local medical college if I can persuade them that making a dual etiological/epidemiological map of autism by slipping in through a diagnostic side door is worth their time. What do I do?
I'm not lacking for focus: I'm specifically interested in autism and in looking at it from two angles that often don't occur to researchers––I have some insight because I'm on the autism spectrum. I've reduced some broad ideas into over a dozen possible experiments ranging from meta-analyses to large lab experiments involving techniques I'd need to be taught.
I was set to begin in a lab last month but the lab director, who's one of my mentors and who I would be working with, got terrible news: his wife was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He's obviously distracted now and I can't fault him for it at all but I've tried over a dozen other researchers over the past two years and they either don't have time or their research doesn't overlap enough with my interests. I've explained to everyone that any lab experience is good experience, but there's a lot of competition for lab assistant slots at my school and most are taken by grad students.
I wanted to begin autism research now and pursue it through med school, though I am probably too old (and nontraditional in other ways) for an MD, much less an MD/PhD; do I throw together some informatics things on my own and explain my interests and why I haven't pursued them yet, or do I need evidence on record of X months/years of experience in order to 1) get into med school, and 2) pursue any research while at med school?
Right now I feel like I have zero chance of getting in anywhere without lab research experience, so I'm contemplating not even applying if I'm automatically going to be rejected because I couldn't find research. Again, though, with a social sciences and humanities/qualitative background I could do something quick and dirty on my own or with faculty at the local medical college if I can persuade them that making a dual etiological/epidemiological map of autism by slipping in through a diagnostic side door is worth their time. What do I do?