Officially committed to Columbia after receiving the $40k Heilbrunn Scholarship! Has anybody that has committed to Columbia received any email about next steps in enrollment (if there are any)?
Last edited:
I haven't recieved any further information from them after paying the depositOfficially committed to Columbia! Has anybody that has committed to Columbia received any email about next steps in enrollment (if there are any)?
I haven't recieved any further information from them after paying the deposit
Here is a facebook page I found for the whole public health class (MPH, MS, etc.) but I haven't found one specifically for MPH students :/Lol same. I haven't seen an FB group either :/
Here is a facebook page I found for the whole public health class (MPH, MS, etc.) but I haven't found one specifically for MPH students :/
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com
Let me split it into two perspectives: Why NOT medicine and WHY public health. Disclaimer: this is part of my reason and may not be applicable to anyone else. Take it with a grain of salt.What made you decide to make the switch from pre med to MPH? I'm kind of strongly considering right now but am pretty confused.
When Columbia offers you $40k 2 days after the deadline...reconsidering now...
I also asked for an appeal from BU and they also told me it would be a few weeks before hearing back. But it actually only took 9 days (including the weekend) to hear back.
I also asked for an appeal from BU and they also told me it would be a few weeks before hearing back. But it actually only took 9 days (including the weekend) to hear back.
I also asked for an appeal from BU and they also told me it would be a few weeks before hearing back. But it actually only took 9 days (including the weekend) to hear back.
Thanks!! This was so so helpful! Have not heard back yet but fingers crossed for this week.I sent my initial appeal letter on 4/5, received confirmation of receipt on 4/6, and heard back on their decision today 4/17.
Edit: they did say I would find out after the deposit deadline when they had a better idea of available funds, so I imagine it would be a quicker turnaround now.
Hi! I let them know that I had more funding from a top program and that I would be able to stay with family at the other school, eliminating a lot of cost of living expenses. I thanked them A LOT and told them that my decision would ultimately come down to financial responsibility since I hope to continue my education after the MPH. Not sure if this helps, but it never hurts to ask!That’s amazing! I will also be attending Brown this fall in the Epi department. If you don’t mind me asking, how did you go about appealing for more merit scholarship funding?
Ugh also just got an email from a Harvard housing that they’re delaying the application cycle til Mid-May while they reevaluate.. sad the fall semester seems so complicatedUniversities begin considering the possibility of canceling in-person classes until 2021
Universities begin considering the possibility of canceling in-person classes until 2021 | CNN
A number of universities are beginning to consider the possibility that in-person classes may not resume until 2021.edition.cnn.com
Universities begin considering the possibility of canceling in-person classes until 2021
Universities begin considering the possibility of canceling in-person classes until 2021 | CNN
A number of universities are beginning to consider the possibility that in-person classes may not resume until 2021.edition.cnn.com
Here's my take. Because you were accepted, you shouldn't worry about someone taking your spot. The university cannot un-accept you. Moreover, I believe that you are entitled to all information that affects your decision to attend (e.g. cost of attendance/tuition). If I were you, I would not pull the trigger until you get your financial aid package. You haven't done anything wrong, and it would be foolish of the university to hold that against you.This might be a dumb question but should I submit my enrollment deposit before I get my financial aid package? I was supposed to receive it today and the deadline to submit my enrollment deposit is this Tuesday. I have contacted financial aid multiple times and they haven't been the most helpful. The person told me she awarded me an aid package while on the phone and said I would get an email about it today but I haven't yet. I just want to make sure I am guaranteed a spot.
Here's my take. Because you were accepted, you shouldn't worry about someone taking your spot. The university cannot un-accept you. Moreover, I believe that you are entitled to all information that affects your decision to attend (e.g. cost of attendance/tuition). If I were you, I would not pull the trigger until you get your financial aid package. You haven't done anything wrong, and it would be foolish of the university to hold that against you.
Hopefully, you receive your email today. If not there's still next Monday and Tuesday.
I do have an immigration visa process going on.Plz make your research. As an international student; you may face hard time to be a health administrator in US.
Do you have to have both a 3.75 and above 80th percentile? Or one of the two?Hi, here's my experience with appealing with Columbia: if you don't have a 3.75 GPA and above 80th percentile on all sections of your GRE you aren't considered for merit scholarships. Also, $5,000 is the max for the need-based grant. I appealed and was told I didn't meet the criteria and wouldn't be considered. But I later received a $5,000 fellowship for my practicum. Maybe that was because I tried to appeal but who knows!
I ended up declining because I couldn't justify the loans I would need to take out. I would email again since the decision deadline was yesterday!
Do you have to have both a 3.75 and above 80th percentile? Or one of the two?
If you have access to them, I would suggest watching Governor Cuomo’s briefings instead of Trump’s. Cuomo has a much better grip on reality and what is actually happening in NYS (this is coming from someone who lives in NY currently). The situation in NYC is going to have the greatest effect on your studies in the fall. I would keep an eye on the visa/immigration status through a reputable newspaper here in the US but otherwise try and avoid the Trump briefings, they’re not only a waste of time but they don’t give a clear picture of what’s going on in the US because he doesn’t have a clue.Anybody else worrying about how bad the potential second wave of coronavirus could get after hearing Trump making suggestions about injecting disinfectant? I am an international student and I have already accepted my offer at Columbia for this fall. I considered deferring for a year but I really want to start studying this MPH as soon as possible, which is why I accepted the offer instead of deferring in the first place. However, after watching that briefing, I was just wondering whether I will be putting myself and my studies in danger by moving to NYC at this point in time...
Anybody else worrying about how bad the potential second wave of coronavirus could get after hearing Trump making suggestions about injecting disinfectant? I am an international student and I have already accepted my offer at Columbia for this fall. I considered deferring for a year but I really want to start studying this MPH as soon as possible, which is why I accepted the offer instead of deferring in the first place. However, after watching that briefing, I was just wondering whether I will be putting myself and my studies in danger by moving to NYC at this point in time...
I don't think that Trump, by virtue of occupying the White House, necessarily has privileged or more detailed information about what is going to happen with coronavirus versus what you can conclude from what the CDC and researchers are saying, if you were implying that he secretly knows that an enormous second peak is coming? I don't think anybody knows exactly what will happen, and you don't need to read the tea leaves to know that life won't be completely normal for a while, but many of the enjoyable social aspects of life may trickle back into place. Trump had a reality show and it seems like he still has a need to be at the center of attention, maybe even to entertain people, I don't think there will be bags of "Lysol" hanging from IV poles in hospitals anytime soon.
I haven't watched a full Trump or Cuomo briefing, most of that information, if there is any new information, is condense in written form which can be more quickly read. I'll read on article on what Fauci or Birx said, rarely see a video clip of them talking.
There is a lot of information specific to NYC via the Cuomo briefings, but also remember that this is a fluid situation and a couple months ago people in NYC weren't sure how much of society to shutdown and there was even a big fight in NYC about if the public schools should be closed. Some points to consider:
1. There was a second peak to the 1918 flu pandemic which was worst than the first, and the computer models and common sense seems to indicate that if a majority of the susceptible population starts doing what they were doing in NYC before the coronavirus pandemic started, then yes, you'd probably have a lot more cases, people dying in higher numbers and hospitals clogged. So, while a second coronavirus peak could theoretically happen if we go back to life as normal, and be even more devastating, things won't be switched on like a light switch, you'll probably have certain areas open up slightly with big restrictions such as everybody wears a mask in public, physical (social) distancing, and other such measures and researchers will wait and see what happens and continuously analyze the data. So . . . even if Columbia is open in the fall, classes will be much different, probably won't be physical office hours, a portion of classes might be online, you might not have an internship with certain NGOs or the health department depending on what is going on.
2. Coronavirus spread like wild-fire because we're all super interconnected, more so than in 1918, I think going forward there will be an emphasis on limiting physical interactions to what is necessary, if you are in school, maybe you go to 1-2 in-person classes per week, but the rest of the time you are mostly in your apartment, you aren't participating in other social activities as much in NYC, you might have to walk versus ride the subway, you might meet up with friends for study groups online, so if coronavirus spreads into the Columbia school population, it spreads much less slowly into other social circles such as nursing homes or first responders in NYC. I could see Columbia partially re-starting some classes, doing an online/in-person hybrid only to have a cluster of coronavirus cases and deciding to shutdown again in November.
3. Nobody is 100% sure why coronavirus is so severe in NYC, there have been a higher absolute number of cases at this point in time, and there are still cases trickling in. Maybe in California there were less than a dozen initial cases imported from China, whereas in New York there were maybe hundreds coming from Europe, so possibly more infection chains were started simultaneously in New York, less likely possibility is that the mutations in the different COVID-19 strains actually make the Italian strain somehow slightly more contagious or virulent? NYC is a super dense metropolis, and isolation of very sick patients from contact with others might be harder than in California just due to physical crowding. It was thought that the 1918 flu pandemic second peak was much worse as the very sick soldiers were transported from the frontlines of world war 1 and came into contact with more people, such as healthcare providers, versus the mildly sick who pretty much stayed home, so a more virulent/deadly 1918 flu strain passed around the world in the second peak. If so, having adequate PPE for healthcare workers in NYC is critical not just for saving their lives, but also recognizing that hospitals concentrate the sickest coronavirus patients and that infection can bounce back between the hospital and the community several times, there are huge populations in NYC, as wells as dozens of hospital overflowing with coronavirus patients, it is a positive feedback loop that can only be stopped by getting population immunity through a vaccine or herd immunity or social distancing, one is a longterm proposition, one (social distancing) can be implemented quickly as we've seen.
4. If coronavirus infections continue in NYC in the coming months, and certain sectors of the economy open up and the cases don't dramatically fall-off, which looks like it might happen, then I don't think Columbia will have in-person classes. Even if Cuomo eventually opens public schools a couple days a week, if the subways are down and there are other issues with students at Columbia they might decide to shift things online. If there is a cheap coronavirus test Columbia might combine that with a health questionnaire every month to monitor the student population, but NYC might not be there yet as so many people have had the virus and it is still passing around the community. Nobody knows if you can get coronavirus within a couple of weeks or months of having had it, or if a second infection with coronavirus is worse, as happens with dengue, probably not, but this disease has surprised a lot of people.
5. Who knows if there are going to be sufficient public health jobs in two years, it looks like we're going into a recession/depression, doubtlessly public health related jobs will be lost, not sure how many permanent positions would open up in two years, definitely pays to ask for lower tuition if classes aren't fully in-person, or if they are online.
6. There are some people in their 20s in NYC hospital ICUs who needed to be intubated, surprising doctors, chances for everybody of whatever age group that you'll survive infection, but still if Columbia reopens, they get 400 students in the fall and then that semester 1-2 of them die of coronavirus or are hospitalized, and it starts half a dozen community chains of infection in NYC anew and a dozen people are hospitalized, a lot of people would say that it isn't worth it to reopen school then.
7. Public health schools in the coming years no doubt with look at their curriculum and how well it and the school's focus meet the needs of society, currently you've got public health concentrations centered around global warming and all sorts of topics which might be less pressing at least in the next couple of years if people aren't driving as much. There is a resurgence of STIs like gonorrhea and chlamydia, malaria might resurge in Africa, in addition to obviously coronavirus which might become a chronic problem, but you've also got billions of people walking around with a smartphone in their pockets that has more computing power than computers from decades ago used in research institutions, hopefully governmental public health budgets will increase while obviously private institutions employing public health people will lay some people off.
8. The CDC made a lot of mistakes early on, that's OK, but they've (we've) got to learn from their mistakes. One was having the ability to test for emerging diseases in a scaleable fashion, that didn't happen, also getting tests ready befor the virus hits, instead of hoping they don't hit the US didn't happen, at least as far as I know. Simple facemasks might be able to reduce transmission by some percentage, not as perfect as an N95 or better, but reducing the spread of coronavirus early on would have saved thousands of lives without a doubt, having a standing national system for quickly getting the public to wear masks in case of a viral flare up would have bought us more time. I think people look at the pictures of people from 1918 wearing masks made of gauze and there is almost laughter as they look primitive, but even if something has a modest effect for a single person, it can have a big public health effect, especially if it pushes R naught below one. I think the CDC needs a new branch dealing with pandemic response and having resources in place ahead of time, I'm talking about warehouses with PPE, like masks, production areas for making tests and specialists in biological sciences they can mobilize like the National Guard. I've felt for a longtime that there needs to be a national center of vaccinology, dedicated to making vaccines to everything, even rare stuff, as you never know when you're going to need it, and also to study how vaccines work and why some vaccines fail. So, yes, the CDC messed up in their budgeting, for many years, at least a decade ago, the WHO's primary concern was that pandemic flu would return and kill hundreds of millions of people, CDC should focus on that (emerging viruses, flu, coronavirus) as well in terms of funding basic research and clinical trials.
I am not sure where you are attending, and it might be different there, but I am under the impression that very few MPH students are able to fund their degree with TA/RA positions. You should talk to current students at your school to get a sense of how common it is there in normal times. That being said, TA/RAships might be more competitive than ever this year. You should be reaching out to faculty proactively, and communicating interest in conducting research with them or TAing their course. Do not wait for someone to notify you of opportunities.
I received both my TA/RA positions because I outright asked for the jobs. My research boss wasn't hiring but made a position for me. My teaching boss wasn't hiring TAs yet but teaches a large course that occurs every year, so I knew he would have openings eventually.
Now, more than ever, you need to be your own advocate.
Both is what they said during their financial aid virtual chats.Do you have to have both a 3.75 and above 80th percentile? Or one of the two?
Can someone guide me?
I decided to go to Harvard but just a couple of days ago I recieved a full tuition + 15.000 fellowship from Emory.
My main concern right now is that in my country Emory is not a “known” school while everyone knows Harvard. Any suggestions?
By "deciding" do you mean "I submitted my enrollment deposit"? If you submitted your enrollment deposit, I would definitely ask Harvard about their withdrawal policies. I wouldn't expect a refund, however. Regarding Emory, it is definitely a reputed school in public health. Neighboring the CDC, they are playing a huge role in the COVID-19 pandemic.Can someone guide me?
I decided to go to Harvard but just a couple of days ago I recieved a full tuition + 15.000 fellowship from Emory.
My main concern right now is that in my country Emory is not a “known” school while everyone knows Harvard. Any suggestions?
What do you believe that "something" wrong is? In my opinion, I cannot see a reason why you would need to commit to more than one institution. You went through the tough process of weighing the pros and cons of each university and determined that JHU is your top choice, hence why you committed there. Therefore, by second-guessing your choice, you are, in a way, selling yourself short. Needless to say, you would be paying another enrollment deposit. It appears like a lose-lose to me. Save your money and spend it on essentials.I committed to Johns Hopkins MHS, which in all likelihood I am going to defer for next year. I also received offer from U of Mich and Columbia. My question is if I also accept offer from one of these schools and defer it for next year, is it considered unethical or wrong? The reason I am thinking to do this is because although I am 99.9999 percent sure I want to attend Hopkins, there is a small chance that something goes wrong and I might not be unable to do it, so just want to have a backup plan. Just wanted to know, is it considered wrong or would I lose anything ( apart from enrolment deposit) if I say yes to two schools?
I suggest you to go Emory if MPH is not the terminal/final degree you consider. But, if you have ton of money to spend, then go for Harvard. Besides, your field of interest is also need to consider. Emory is known for the works associated with CDC and mainly scientific research oriented.Can someone guide me?
I decided to go to Harvard but just a couple of days ago I recieved a full tuition + 15.000 fellowship from Emory.
My main concern right now is that in my country Emory is not a “known” school while everyone knows Harvard. Any suggestions?
I applied to health management. I Am planning to do -maybe- a MBA afterwards.I suggest you to go Emory if MPH is not the terminal/final degree you consider. But, if you have ton of money to spend, then go for Harvard. Besides, your field of interest is also need to consider. Emory is known for the works associated with CDC and mainly scientific research oriented.
I applied to health management. I Am planning to do -maybe- a MBA afterwards.
I'd choose Emory because both are great programs and you would be saving so much, especially because you're thinking about getting another degree afterwards. Emory is known and respected within public health so unless you want to work in your country or you want to work with a specific professor at Harvard, I'd accept Emory's offer.Can someone guide me?
I decided to go to Harvard but just a couple of days ago I recieved a full tuition + 15.000 fellowship from Emory.
My main concern right now is that in my country Emory is not a “known” school while everyone knows Harvard. Any suggestions?
Can someone guide me?
I decided to go to Harvard but just a couple of days ago I recieved a full tuition + 15.000 fellowship from Emory.
My main concern right now is that in my country Emory is not a “known” school while everyone knows Harvard. Any suggestions?
UCLA has a program in Community Health Sciences, which may fit your needs.Trying to Find schools with good CHE( Community Health Education) programs, any suggestions, University Of Tennessee- Knoxville is one of my top choices currently
I agree! I feel like campuses are being very over-optimistic because they don't want students to defer or decline... this is obviously in their financial interests, but its not in the best interests of students.I just got an email from Emory confirming that they plan to have their campus open in the fall. Maybe I'm overreacting a bit, but I'm getting annoyed because it seems obvious to me that they'll end up needing some type of alternative format in the fall, and we're just going through the motions to delay the inevitable at this point. Even at baseline in a best case scenario, large gatherings won't be possible, so big face to face lectures are out of the question. I think it's so irresponsible to keep students on the hook like this rather than make a decision well in advance and allow students maximum time to adjust to the situation. Having to switch gears at the last minute or during the actual semester will not be fun and is not the best decision for students. I'd rather they prepare for the best alternative format semester they could get rather than wait and sabotage it until it's certain they'll be required to move close campus.
Sorry, rant over!
I emailed to ask about this before today's email and they said they were currently working on on-campus classes with social distancing measures but do not have a final plan. The backup plan is online classes until it's safe to return to campus. They've said if it is delayed, they're "optimistic that it won't be the whole year."I just got an email from Emory confirming that they plan to have their campus open in the fall. Maybe I'm overreacting a bit, but I'm getting annoyed because it seems obvious to me that they'll end up needing some type of alternative format in the fall, and we're just going through the motions to delay the inevitable at this point. Even at baseline in a best case scenario, large gatherings won't be possible, so big face to face lectures are out of the question. I think it's so irresponsible to keep students on the hook like this rather than make a decision well in advance and allow students maximum time to adjust to the situation. Having to switch gears at the last minute or during the actual semester will not be fun and is not the best decision for students. I'd rather they prepare for the best alternative format semester they could get rather than wait and sabotage it until it's certain they'll be required to move to close campus.
Sorry, rant over!
I emailed to ask about this before today's email and they said they were currently working on on-campus classes with social distancing measures but do not have a final plan. The backup plan is online classes until it's safe to return to campus. They've said if it is delayed, they're "optimistic that it won't be the whole year."
Of course, they have financial interests in trying to keep classes on campus. But the reality is that it's hard to predict what the situation will be in three months. I assume they won't be able to tell us what's going on until the summer which makes it hard to plan anything.
I just got an email from Emory confirming that they plan to have their campus open in the fall. Maybe I'm overreacting a bit, but I'm getting annoyed because it seems obvious to me that they'll end up needing some type of alternative format in the fall, and we're just going through the motions to delay the inevitable at this point. Even at baseline in a best case scenario, large gatherings won't be possible, so big face to face lectures are out of the question. I think it's so irresponsible to keep students on the hook like this rather than make a decision well in advance and allow students maximum time to adjust to the situation. Having to switch gears at the last minute or during the actual semester will not be fun and is not the best decision for students. I'd rather they prepare for the best alternative format semester they could get rather than wait and sabotage it until it's certain they'll be required to move to close campus.
Sorry, rant over!