- Joined
- Apr 15, 2004
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 0
Well, I found this article online that is at a site that requires membership, so I felt the need to share this with you pre-pod and DPM's. Sorry for the long post, but it is pretty intriguing. I wonder how the rest of the medical community is going to respond to this though. I edited some pod history and background to fit the post.
"Resolved: That the APMA prepare a membership referendum to vote on the goal of becoming the third US medical profession (following the MD's and most recently the DO's professions) to achieve an 'unlimited scope of practice' by the year 2015."
Purpose
The purpose of this commentary is to support APMA Resolution 2-05 "Unlimited Scope of Practice for Podiatric Physicians" which was adopted unanimously by the Ohio Podiatric Medical Association's House of Delegates June 9, 2004. There are many reasons for supporting this resolution; this commentary will address these needs:
* Establish equivalency between podiatry and the MD/DO medical and surgical specialties.
* Achieve physician status and remove the risks to patients of misclassifying podiatrists as an "optional service' in public entitlement programs or a 'supplemental benefit' in private insurance coverage/fees.
* Advance the freedom to practice podiatric medicine and surgery within podiatrists' surgical and clinical knowledge.
Introduction
How is it possible that eighty-four podiatrists unanimously voted to approve this vision as Delegates to the Ohio Podiatric Medical Association House of Delegates?
These eighty-four podiatrists included every aspect of the podiatric profession from retired podiatrists to students, from surgeons to primary care podiatrists, from urban to rural podiatrists, from private practice to the President and Dean of Academic Affairs at the Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine. While there was a full and free discussion of this resolution, once it became understood, it unified the entire profession; there was not a single negative.
Should this April's APMA House of Delegates approve this resolution, then every member of the American Podiatric Medical Association would have the same opportunity to vote on the policy in an APMA referendum.
Background
In many ways the resolution represents an 'organic evolutionary process' in which the clinical, surgical, and medical abilities of the podiatric medical education and medical practices have become too effective in treating patients to remain limited in scope.
Anatomical Limitations
Why should a podiatrist be able to save a diabetic patient's foot from amputation, but not be able to treat the same diabetic ulcer if it is a half inch above some anatomical line drawn by lay legislators? This is exactly the problem we had with an Ohio Diabetic Wound Care Center whose podiatrists were actually getting a 90% diabetic ulcer amputation reduction rate.
How can a podiatrist be a "real doctor" if you crush your foot, but not a "real doctor" if you scrape your knee? Podiatry is so confusing to the general public, most of which have never been to a podiatrist, that television's #1 rated Jerry Seinfeld Show did an entire program on whether a podiatrist was a real doctor or not?
Podiatry's clinical, medical, and surgical abilities have become too important to patients to allow confusion by virtue of an illogical anatomically-triggered scope of practice to impede patients from accessing podiatric care. Podiatry's scope of practice separates it from every other medical specialty in the U.S.
Podiatric Residency Programs
Podiatry's development of graduate medical education residency programs was linked to the medical education process only in recent generations of practitioners. Currently, podiatric residents, just like the osteopathic residents of the 1950's, are clinically trained in full body systems.
Today's podiatric accredited residencies require podiatric residents to be rotated through different medical specialty departments so they are trained as full scope physicians, just as MD and DO residents are trained regardless of their chosen medical specialty.
For example, psychiatric MD residents rotate through OBG-YN departments to deliver babies, surgery departments to do surgery, and internal medicine/family practice department to do clinical medicine before they specialize in psychiatric practice.
Podiatric residents have similar rotations through a number of these same medical specialty departments and are required to do a complete comprehensive history and physical examination as part of their accredited training program. (See Council on Podiatric Medical Education 320, Standards and Requirements for Approval of Residencies in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, page 20, B Assess and Manage the Patient's General Medical Status, Items 1-4)
The average layman or legislator does not understand how the Ohio podiatric scope of practice limits podiatric physicians to using their clinical and surgical skills to treating the foot or ankle by state law (ORC Sec. 4731.51), yet allows podiatric residents to train in full body systems with the need to have the ankle or foot disease or injury triggering their training?
This is because the state law grants podiatry residency training certificates (ORC Sec. 4731.573) which limit the podiatric residents training to the accredited hospital residency program under the supervision of the podiatric residency training director. The statute, however, cites the Council on Podiatric Education's residency accreditation requirements as the basis for the training certificate.
This allows podiatric residents to be trained in all aspects of the human body, including the ability to perform a total physical examination of patients the same as any MD or DO medical specialties are trained.
Podiatry can be viewed as American medicine's first attempt to specialize and its last medical specialty to bloom via clinical and surgical graduate residency training programs.
Interestingly enough, even the issue of dropping the DO degree and exchanging it for an MD degree was tried by California DO's back in the 1960's. After a few years, the osteopathic physicians reversed their earlier decision to accept an MD degree and returned to the DO degree, which gave them their unique professional identity. They found it was the freedom to practice osteopathic medicine that empowered their profession, not the MD degree.
If the podiatric profession should approve Resolution 2-05, then it would place into motion a 10 year program to adjust podiatric medical education's system to follow the MD's and DO's pathway to an unlimited scope of practice.
Timetable for Implementation of Unlimited Scope of Practice
April, 2005 -- Step 1 -- "Unlimited Scope of Practice" Ohio House of Delegates' Resolution will be debated by the APMA House of Delegates. If passed, it will become an APMA membership referendum.
Summer/Fall 2005 -- Step 2 -- If the APMA House approves Resolution 2-05, ballots will be provided to APMA members to vote on this issue. For it to become the goal of the APMA requires approval by a majority of APMA members.
Fall/Winter 2005 -- Step 3 -- If the APMA member referendum on creating an "unlimited scope of practice" succeeds, then the APMA will initiate formal communications with the American Medical Association and the American Osteopathic Association requesting help and assistance in achieving this goal. This will include a formal request for assistance from the AMA and the AOA for re-engineering the podiatric medical education system to produce an unlimited scope of practice to podiatrists over the next 10 years.
2006 to 2009 -- Step 4 -- Following a series of meetings between the APMA, AMA and AOA, a task force will be created to create an integrated medical school and residency training experience and to produce an unlimited scope of practice podiatrist.
2009-2012 -- Step 5 -- The APMA/AMA/AOA Task Force would work with the eight podiatric medical colleges and residency programs to implement the educational changes necessary to create an unlimited scope of practice podiatrist.
2012-2015 -- Step 6 -- the APMA/AMA/AOA Task Force would work to create model state legislation to allow for grandfathering in all current podiatric physicians and surgeons who wish to keep their current state podiatric scope of practice while repealing all anatomically limited foot/ankle scopes of practice for newly trained podiatrists.
Podiatrists who already are in practice and wish to move to an unlimited scope of practice would need to supplement their training and pass a licensure examination once the unlimited scope of practice became state law. Once again we can look to the osteopathic profession approach to phasing in the unlimited scope of practice with doctors who were trained and practiced under the osteopathic limited scope of practice laws.
Conclusion
Whatever vision you as members of the podiatric profession choose to follow, it is critically important that you do have some vision to guide your profession through the turbulent times our nation's health care and insurance systems will surely be facing over the next ten years. Franklin Delano Roosevelt's second inaugural address used a biblical quote: "Without vision, the people perish."
The podiatric profession is fast approaching the 100th year anniversary of the birth of "modern American podiatry"; like the 'century plant' that only blooms once in a 100 years, podiatry is blossoming.
As APMA President Dr. Lloyd Smith stated in his recent editorial, "The Golden Age of Podiatry is now ... don't miss out on being a part of it!"
Mr. Fetgatter is Executive Director of the Ohio Podiatric Medical Association.
"Resolved: That the APMA prepare a membership referendum to vote on the goal of becoming the third US medical profession (following the MD's and most recently the DO's professions) to achieve an 'unlimited scope of practice' by the year 2015."
Purpose
The purpose of this commentary is to support APMA Resolution 2-05 "Unlimited Scope of Practice for Podiatric Physicians" which was adopted unanimously by the Ohio Podiatric Medical Association's House of Delegates June 9, 2004. There are many reasons for supporting this resolution; this commentary will address these needs:
* Establish equivalency between podiatry and the MD/DO medical and surgical specialties.
* Achieve physician status and remove the risks to patients of misclassifying podiatrists as an "optional service' in public entitlement programs or a 'supplemental benefit' in private insurance coverage/fees.
* Advance the freedom to practice podiatric medicine and surgery within podiatrists' surgical and clinical knowledge.
Introduction
How is it possible that eighty-four podiatrists unanimously voted to approve this vision as Delegates to the Ohio Podiatric Medical Association House of Delegates?
These eighty-four podiatrists included every aspect of the podiatric profession from retired podiatrists to students, from surgeons to primary care podiatrists, from urban to rural podiatrists, from private practice to the President and Dean of Academic Affairs at the Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine. While there was a full and free discussion of this resolution, once it became understood, it unified the entire profession; there was not a single negative.
Should this April's APMA House of Delegates approve this resolution, then every member of the American Podiatric Medical Association would have the same opportunity to vote on the policy in an APMA referendum.
Background
In many ways the resolution represents an 'organic evolutionary process' in which the clinical, surgical, and medical abilities of the podiatric medical education and medical practices have become too effective in treating patients to remain limited in scope.
Anatomical Limitations
Why should a podiatrist be able to save a diabetic patient's foot from amputation, but not be able to treat the same diabetic ulcer if it is a half inch above some anatomical line drawn by lay legislators? This is exactly the problem we had with an Ohio Diabetic Wound Care Center whose podiatrists were actually getting a 90% diabetic ulcer amputation reduction rate.
How can a podiatrist be a "real doctor" if you crush your foot, but not a "real doctor" if you scrape your knee? Podiatry is so confusing to the general public, most of which have never been to a podiatrist, that television's #1 rated Jerry Seinfeld Show did an entire program on whether a podiatrist was a real doctor or not?
Podiatry's clinical, medical, and surgical abilities have become too important to patients to allow confusion by virtue of an illogical anatomically-triggered scope of practice to impede patients from accessing podiatric care. Podiatry's scope of practice separates it from every other medical specialty in the U.S.
Podiatric Residency Programs
Podiatry's development of graduate medical education residency programs was linked to the medical education process only in recent generations of practitioners. Currently, podiatric residents, just like the osteopathic residents of the 1950's, are clinically trained in full body systems.
Today's podiatric accredited residencies require podiatric residents to be rotated through different medical specialty departments so they are trained as full scope physicians, just as MD and DO residents are trained regardless of their chosen medical specialty.
For example, psychiatric MD residents rotate through OBG-YN departments to deliver babies, surgery departments to do surgery, and internal medicine/family practice department to do clinical medicine before they specialize in psychiatric practice.
Podiatric residents have similar rotations through a number of these same medical specialty departments and are required to do a complete comprehensive history and physical examination as part of their accredited training program. (See Council on Podiatric Medical Education 320, Standards and Requirements for Approval of Residencies in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, page 20, B Assess and Manage the Patient's General Medical Status, Items 1-4)
The average layman or legislator does not understand how the Ohio podiatric scope of practice limits podiatric physicians to using their clinical and surgical skills to treating the foot or ankle by state law (ORC Sec. 4731.51), yet allows podiatric residents to train in full body systems with the need to have the ankle or foot disease or injury triggering their training?
This is because the state law grants podiatry residency training certificates (ORC Sec. 4731.573) which limit the podiatric residents training to the accredited hospital residency program under the supervision of the podiatric residency training director. The statute, however, cites the Council on Podiatric Education's residency accreditation requirements as the basis for the training certificate.
This allows podiatric residents to be trained in all aspects of the human body, including the ability to perform a total physical examination of patients the same as any MD or DO medical specialties are trained.
Podiatry can be viewed as American medicine's first attempt to specialize and its last medical specialty to bloom via clinical and surgical graduate residency training programs.
Interestingly enough, even the issue of dropping the DO degree and exchanging it for an MD degree was tried by California DO's back in the 1960's. After a few years, the osteopathic physicians reversed their earlier decision to accept an MD degree and returned to the DO degree, which gave them their unique professional identity. They found it was the freedom to practice osteopathic medicine that empowered their profession, not the MD degree.
If the podiatric profession should approve Resolution 2-05, then it would place into motion a 10 year program to adjust podiatric medical education's system to follow the MD's and DO's pathway to an unlimited scope of practice.
Timetable for Implementation of Unlimited Scope of Practice
April, 2005 -- Step 1 -- "Unlimited Scope of Practice" Ohio House of Delegates' Resolution will be debated by the APMA House of Delegates. If passed, it will become an APMA membership referendum.
Summer/Fall 2005 -- Step 2 -- If the APMA House approves Resolution 2-05, ballots will be provided to APMA members to vote on this issue. For it to become the goal of the APMA requires approval by a majority of APMA members.
Fall/Winter 2005 -- Step 3 -- If the APMA member referendum on creating an "unlimited scope of practice" succeeds, then the APMA will initiate formal communications with the American Medical Association and the American Osteopathic Association requesting help and assistance in achieving this goal. This will include a formal request for assistance from the AMA and the AOA for re-engineering the podiatric medical education system to produce an unlimited scope of practice to podiatrists over the next 10 years.
2006 to 2009 -- Step 4 -- Following a series of meetings between the APMA, AMA and AOA, a task force will be created to create an integrated medical school and residency training experience and to produce an unlimited scope of practice podiatrist.
2009-2012 -- Step 5 -- The APMA/AMA/AOA Task Force would work with the eight podiatric medical colleges and residency programs to implement the educational changes necessary to create an unlimited scope of practice podiatrist.
2012-2015 -- Step 6 -- the APMA/AMA/AOA Task Force would work to create model state legislation to allow for grandfathering in all current podiatric physicians and surgeons who wish to keep their current state podiatric scope of practice while repealing all anatomically limited foot/ankle scopes of practice for newly trained podiatrists.
Podiatrists who already are in practice and wish to move to an unlimited scope of practice would need to supplement their training and pass a licensure examination once the unlimited scope of practice became state law. Once again we can look to the osteopathic profession approach to phasing in the unlimited scope of practice with doctors who were trained and practiced under the osteopathic limited scope of practice laws.
Conclusion
Whatever vision you as members of the podiatric profession choose to follow, it is critically important that you do have some vision to guide your profession through the turbulent times our nation's health care and insurance systems will surely be facing over the next ten years. Franklin Delano Roosevelt's second inaugural address used a biblical quote: "Without vision, the people perish."
The podiatric profession is fast approaching the 100th year anniversary of the birth of "modern American podiatry"; like the 'century plant' that only blooms once in a 100 years, podiatry is blossoming.
As APMA President Dr. Lloyd Smith stated in his recent editorial, "The Golden Age of Podiatry is now ... don't miss out on being a part of it!"
Mr. Fetgatter is Executive Director of the Ohio Podiatric Medical Association.