- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,497
- Reaction score
- 6,025
I would like for "Experts" to make recommendations on scientific basis and allow each American to decide what is best for their family/community. I realize that sometimes there are no sound scientific basis and just anecdotal evidence/sound observations. BUT when there are no scientific basis, then just come out and be honest with the "ignorant" public. I rather them come out and say, "We do not have very good scientific evidence but a 3rd shot may be beneficial especially in the high risk population so we currently recommend it" rather than "The scientific community recommends a 3rd shot"You appear to want absolute scientific rigor for views contrary to yours while accepting anecdotal experience and inference as support for views you are sympathetic to.
I hasten to add that this is a common mistake, and certainly one I am not above making.
Look, we have ample evidence than people who got Either of the 3 vaccines had very little poor outcome/hospitalization due to Delta. We already know that getting the shot does not prevent getting infected. So what is a 3rd shot preventing? Its not preventing getting infected. Given the super Low admission rates, then are we trying achieve a Super Super Super low admission rate?
Now my anecdotal experience just applies to my family and just increases my plan not to get a booster. The CDC advisory committee voted against boosters for healthy healthcare workers which I am part of. It was overrulled by the director which almost never happens which tells me it was due to all the political pressures put on her.
TLDR - Make CDC/Gov recommendations based on scientific fact or be honest that the recommendation has no scientific basis. People should decide what is best for them and their family. If you want to protect your family, get them vaccinated which I did already then we are protected from a bad outcome.