Botox for neuropathic pain

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drg123

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2017
Messages
85
Reaction score
49
Has anyone here successfully used Botox (subcutaneous) for neuropathic pain (e.g. diabetic neuropathy).
The Europeans have been using for some time and there are numerous good studies
I don't think Botox is approved here for this indication but one could do off-label, cash pay?
Thoughts?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Yes. Post thoracotomy pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yes. Post thoracotomy pain.
How did you handle the finances? Cash pay or did you get it covered by insurance somehow? Or did you call it a 'trigger point injection'?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Yes for PHN…was at the VA
 
Botox in a scar or a neuroma is helpful. Neuroma injxns with Botox are painful.
 
Done as an ICNB?
No it actually involved VI-II. Just injected the the face in those two distributions in the face. There are several papers out there describing the technique
 
I've done it in CRPS as they'll sometimes have a focal dystonia, and then use the rest in a grid pattern after a nerve block proximal. If you're doing it for pure neuropathic pain, it would be cash pay or done for VA/etc.

Key thing here is to just do SQ injections as you're not trying to get into the muscle at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Has anybody used Xeomin for this? Cheaper and it’s off label either way.
 
Not sure if this is helpful, but years ago, I spoke with the medical science liaison for xeomin

He was a pharmacist at the VA

He said that they had done an internal data review at the VA and found that for what they had used xeomin for, the efficacy was non-inferior to Botox, at a conversion rate of 1:1 unit

If that guy is still the medical science liaison, he may be able to query their database for that

But then, again, he would still be the medical science liason and perhaps be biased in favor of xeomin
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Anyone ever have success doing off label with a letter of medical necessity to payor? the local rep suggested I might try this, citing studies and such. I feel like this is something the companies should be interested in getting on-label indication for. Huge number of patients would be candidates and it's safe and fast.
 
N of 1

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Patient did some research and asked for it.
Cash pay
Patient got no relief
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
N of 1

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Patient did some research and asked for it.
Cash pay
Patient got no relief
Thanks for the intel. Sorry to hear it didn't pan out. I think NNT is still something like 3. So checks out.
 
Thanks for the intel. Sorry to hear it didn't pan out. I think NNT is still something like 3. So checks out.
Umm, WTH?

1716041196363.png



 
Umm, WTH?

View attachment 386949


I am using it in this context, not the one you cite above. It can be used both for benefits and harms

And I stand corrected. Here is the source. I said 3. It's apparently 1.9.
1716043399463.png



1.Finnerup, N. B. et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurology 14, 162–173 (2015).
 

Botulinum toxin type A​

Six RCTs evaluated the efficacy of a single administration of BTX-A (50–200 units subcutaneously in the painful area) in peripheral neuropathic pain. The smaller studies had a positive primary outcome (NNT of 1·9 (1·5–2·4) for four studies) with a very low placebo effect, but one large unpublished study was negative. Safety was generally excellent.


The NNT you quoted is not including the large trial that was negative.
 
A better study/review:

 
I am using it in this context, not the one you cite above. It can be used both for benefits and harms

And I stand corrected. Here is the source. I said 3. It's apparently 1.9. View attachment 386950


1.Finnerup, N. B. et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurology 14, 162–173 (2015).


Not a knock on you, but when the authors report an NNT of 4.3 for “Strong Opioids”…the underlying methodology of this paper immediately takes a hit
 
it should be noted in your meta-analysis that there were 6 botox studies, total 137 patients, significantly lower than any of the other treatments, and this was the only interventional treatment.

like lobel stated:

Botulinum toxin type A​

Six RCTs evaluated the efficacy of a single administration of BTX-A (50–200 units subcutaneously in the painful area) in peripheral neuropathic pain. The smaller studies had a positive primary outcome (NNT of 1·9 (1·5–2·4) for four studies) with a very low placebo effect, but one large unpublished study was negative. Safety was generally excellent.
that NNT is only for the smaller studies, did not include the large unpublished one.

the strength of recommendation was weak for use of botox and were recommended as a 3rd line agent in peripheral neuropathy only.

and in their lengthy summary, botox is not mentioned at all.
 
it should be noted in your meta-analysis that there were 6 botox studies, total 137 patients, significantly lower than any of the other treatments, and this was the only interventional treatment.

like lobel stated:

that NNT is only for the smaller studies, did not include the large unpublished one.

the strength of recommendation was weak for use of botox and were recommended as a 3rd line agent in peripheral neuropathy only.

and in their lengthy summary, botox is not mentioned at all.
If they included the larger unpublished study (suppressed by Allergan?), what do you think the analysis would show?
 
seems appropriate to try after they have failed the first and second line treatments.


these patients did fail first and second line treatments, right?


and btw, the lancet article as you correctly posted was a review. id be less likely to use that as basis for decision making than RCTs and other studies.

the first article was based on a total of 66 total patients. not a huge sample size. efficacy was primarily with 2 injections. studied to 24 weeks.

6.5 mean pain intensity at baseline down to 4.6 for botox, compared to 6.4 to 5.8 for placebo.
 
On a side note, has anyone had success using Botox for TPIs like in traps? A neurologist down my street does it and has a lot of success. His patients love it and don’t come back too often. Thanks
 
On a side note, has anyone had success using Botox for TPIs like in traps? A neurologist down my street does it and has a lot of success. His patients love it and don’t come back too often. Thanks
I have patients that I inherited from a previous provider who receive botox for neck pain diagnosed as "cervical dystonia". I felt a little uncomfortable continuing with the procedures as, at least in my opinion, they don't have true dystonia, but the patients swear by them and have done really well so I just continued them. Not a lot but enough to believe that it can be effective.
 
Top