- Joined
- Apr 29, 2013
- Messages
- 486
- Reaction score
- 693
Really should just include US Seniors to measure interest.Never fear
I AM GLAD TO REPORT
the trend is still significant...
Although another rise in 2023 will definitely mean chairs and PD's can say "We are A-OK"
This is the shocking table. Percent unmatched is not comparable to any other field. This is beyond non-competitive. It is indicative of a field willing to match anyone. There is a baseline group of people who probably shouldn't match into anything (our system does close to zero vetting for med school graduation after admission) or has absurd expectations (desire residency in particular town with low med school performance) and this number is greater than 0.8%.
It looked to be 100% last year. 86/86Uh, yeah - correct me if I'm wrong, but looking at that table. 99.2% Matched is the highest number ever for that metric, which means RadOnc is currently the least competitive specialty in the last 17 years from all those specialties measured.
We're #1 in something!
The Generals are fully aware of their losing ways and incompetency. I think the better comparison sadly is...the Washington Football Team.It's official. We are the laughingstock, the Washington Generals of medical specialities.
Heh...Snyder is a miserable human beingThe Generals are fully aware of their losing ways and incompetency. I think the better comparison sadly is...the Washington Football Team.
Come to think of it, Daniel Snyder would probably be an unusually good fit with the ABR. Might lead up a campaign to start suing applicants and residents who speak out of turn about the specialty.
Even many Med students I have had - MD and DO - were shocked. This info must be kinda niche … thanks for ‘stache love, my friend!Very few people in private practice know or even care which specialties are competitive. My radonc partner has no idea any of this has been going on, for example. No medoncs in our practice know, and certainly the surg oncs, breast surgeons, urologists, etc have no idea and would not give one iota of a damn if they did.
The "hierarchy" of specialties that seems so critical in academic medicine (or at the very least palpable) does not exist where I practice. Very refreshing.
Or is rad onc the dallas cowboys (same division). Every year is year things get better yet we sink deeper into bottomless hellpit.It's official. We are the laughingstock, the Washington Generals of medical specialities.
Or is rad onc the dallas cowboys (same division). Every year is year things get better yet we sink deeper into bottomless hellpit.
Our fan base has abandoned us. We are not the Cowboys.Or is rad onc the dallas cowboys (same division). Every year is year things get better yet we sink deeper into bottomless hellpit.
I would be interested to see the NRMP data for step 1 scores… i suspect there is SOME degree of self-selection
As an aside… if massive contraction of residencies is too painful, what about someone like ASTRO or ACR creating some exclusive accreditation for rad onc residencies? Create a two tier system to help the more qualified applicants get jobs down the road? I guess, to some extent, the residency name does that already.