- Joined
- Nov 7, 2001
- Messages
- 433
- Reaction score
- 0
Well I'm bored and have a bit of free time tonight, so did a quick analysis of Step 1 scores from 1999 to present and am including a table from 1996 as well. It's interesting to note how much higher the range has gotten since 1999 which is the first year that the test went to the current computer based one day format.
June 1999 Step 1 Mean 215, SD 20 Range 170-250
June 2000 Step 1 Mean 215, SD 20 Range 175-255
June 2001 Step 1 Mean 215, SD 21 Range 152-278
June 2002 Step 1 Mean 216, SD 24 Range 144-288
The range isn't entirely correct either, but it is what the score report has been saying the typical scores are between these points. I know people who got higher than a 255 when I took Step 1 in June 2000, but they were atypical.
Score Jun-96 Jun-99 Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02
182 NA 4.9 4.9 5.8 7.8
190 19 10.6 10.6 11.7 13.9
195 24 15.9 15.9 17 19.1
200 31 22.7 22.7 23.8 25.2
205 40 30.9 30.9 31.7 32.3
210 48 40.1 40.1 40.6 40.1
215 58 50 50 50 48.3
220 67 59.9 59.9 59.4 56.6
225 75 69.1 69.1 68.3 64.6
230 83 77.3 77.3 76.2 72
235 90 84.1 84.1 83 78.6
240 94 89.4 89.4 88.3 84.1
245 97 93.3 93.3 92.3 88.7
250 99 96 96 95.2 92.2
255 NA 97.7 97.7 97.2 94.8
260 NA 98.8 98.8 98.4 96.7
265 NA 99.4 99.4 99.1 97.9
270 NA 99.7 99.7 99.6 98.8
Yes, I'm bored, but this year, as you can see that someone who scored a 245 this year is about equal to a 240 last year in terms of percentage. I'm not sure what this all means, except it looks like everyone is either getting smarter and/or having better review books/courses to prepare for the exam. This years group of test takers also seems to have a few people that have done worse than before looking at the bottom of the scale as well. I'm guessing that the passing rate will be rising again soon looking at these scores, probably to a 185.
This could be useful for those applying to programs starting July 2004. I'd guess that if you needed a 230 to be competitive this year, you'd need about a 235 to be competitive for residencies starting July 2004 as all your peers will have higher scores as well. Any other thoughts on this?
Sorry about the table, I couldn't get it to line up correctly.
June 1999 Step 1 Mean 215, SD 20 Range 170-250
June 2000 Step 1 Mean 215, SD 20 Range 175-255
June 2001 Step 1 Mean 215, SD 21 Range 152-278
June 2002 Step 1 Mean 216, SD 24 Range 144-288
The range isn't entirely correct either, but it is what the score report has been saying the typical scores are between these points. I know people who got higher than a 255 when I took Step 1 in June 2000, but they were atypical.
Score Jun-96 Jun-99 Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02
182 NA 4.9 4.9 5.8 7.8
190 19 10.6 10.6 11.7 13.9
195 24 15.9 15.9 17 19.1
200 31 22.7 22.7 23.8 25.2
205 40 30.9 30.9 31.7 32.3
210 48 40.1 40.1 40.6 40.1
215 58 50 50 50 48.3
220 67 59.9 59.9 59.4 56.6
225 75 69.1 69.1 68.3 64.6
230 83 77.3 77.3 76.2 72
235 90 84.1 84.1 83 78.6
240 94 89.4 89.4 88.3 84.1
245 97 93.3 93.3 92.3 88.7
250 99 96 96 95.2 92.2
255 NA 97.7 97.7 97.2 94.8
260 NA 98.8 98.8 98.4 96.7
265 NA 99.4 99.4 99.1 97.9
270 NA 99.7 99.7 99.6 98.8
Yes, I'm bored, but this year, as you can see that someone who scored a 245 this year is about equal to a 240 last year in terms of percentage. I'm not sure what this all means, except it looks like everyone is either getting smarter and/or having better review books/courses to prepare for the exam. This years group of test takers also seems to have a few people that have done worse than before looking at the bottom of the scale as well. I'm guessing that the passing rate will be rising again soon looking at these scores, probably to a 185.
This could be useful for those applying to programs starting July 2004. I'd guess that if you needed a 230 to be competitive this year, you'd need about a 235 to be competitive for residencies starting July 2004 as all your peers will have higher scores as well. Any other thoughts on this?
Sorry about the table, I couldn't get it to line up correctly.