If you're an undergrad and so interested in prescribing, why not go into psychiatry instead?
I understand this is an extremely unpopular opinion in these parts but I have yet to see any evidence that the additional training Psychiatrists get in the first 4 years of medical school leads to significantly better outcomes in competence for psychopharmacology on a consistent basis. Or put another way, I haven't seen any evidence of the widespread disasters on the part of Psych NPs and/or Prescribing psychologists that Psychiatrists have been shouting from the rooftops for decades would happen. In fact, I've seen some evidence to quite the contrary. There was a study that came out of Harvard that tested 66 prescribers. A mixture of Psychiatrists, general physicians, psychiatric nurse practitioners, general nurse practitioners, prescribing psychologists, and general psychologists (meaning psychologists without postdoctoral training in psychopharmacology). Psychiatrists performed the best, followed by Prescribing Psychologists, then Psychiatric Nurse Practitioners. According to the study, there was no statistical difference between these 3 groups. General physicians and general nurse practitioners performed worse than these 3 groups, and general psychologists performed worse than them. The study was published as part of a students PHD dissertation on Prescription privileges for psychologists. Happy to post it for anyone interested.
And considering most who prescribe psychotropic meds from the get go are general MDs and General NPs, not psychiatrists, I don't really see any outcry for their supposed lack of relevant knowledge.
If med school/psychiatry was the only way to prescribe, id do it. But its not, and I feel as though too large a portion of the first four years are overkill in terms of volume and not useful for the practice of psychopharmacology.
If I'm not already sentenced to crucifixion yet on this forum for saying this, I believe that in a world that made sense and was more efficient, psychiatry would be it's own thing like dental school is.
I want to do a mixture of both psychotherapy and prescribing in the long run. The overkill and irrelevance of the first four years of medical school combined with the fact that modern psychiatry gets next to no training in psychotherapy of any type in their programs makes it the least palatable option of the 3 major choices in my view. Psych RXP I've considered and in concept makes sense (hence the initial question) but it limits me to a handful of states in which I can practice, most of which I don't want to live in, and in half of those it seems as though the Psych RXP laws are almost intentionally designed to repulse those interested. In Utah you can only prescribe SSRIs. In almost all states you need to have a collaborative relationship with every patients PCP, which, should I want to run my own practice, would be logistically almost impossible, and since you have to have a PCP agree and sign off on any medication change, it sounds like a nightmare for propespective patients as many do not always stick with their first psychotropic drug prescribed. Sometimes it takes multiple attempts to find the right one, as I'm sure many of you know better than I. If the collaboration was temporary, even if the timeframe was years, but eventually was no longer needed, I'd still possibly consider it. And this is of course to say that I'm not a huge fan of research, which you have to eat breath and sleep in a Psychology doctorate even if you want a career in clinical practice. Although sadly I'd be missing out on training in assessments, that was something that greatly interested me too, but I think i have a greater interest in psychopharmacology.
What that leaves me with, and what I'm probably going to end up doing in the end, is become a Psych NP, working under a Dr or working for a clinic/hospital/another private practice for 5-7 years to gain experience and get additional training concurrently in Psychotherapy, in NYC where I currently live there are high quality psychoanalytic institutes that train you in both psychodynamic therapy and psychoanalysis proper. That's something I'm considering, but of course there's other options for psychotherapy. And then eventually start my own private practice part time, and eventually transition fully. This seems like the most logical path for my goals.
If anyone disagrees with me or thinks I'm insane or dangerous or whatever, I'm open to being wrong, but if you could explain how I'm wrong with real world examples that aren't mere theoreticals 99.99998% of the time I'd love to hear it. Alternatively, any additional advice that I might be missing would be greatly appreciated